data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60999/60999d4f35001fe87c1a826a40340eca9ee49f40" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e062/7e062dbcf2ca93243086166c738f2594bce8707a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9007c/9007cf58ecea4d233939bf19d78583ae3c320af8" alt=""
There is a noble tradition of Bad painting with a capital "B." It is a modern spin on mannerism: Instead of merely accenting their work with distortions of perspective, color, composition, and so forth, some artists attempt to will themselves into a state of ineptitude. A noble tradition, and Julian Schnabel does not belong to it.
There are basically two branches of Bad: the anal and the incontinent. Artists of the first variety ape the hackneyed horrors of Sunday painters and thrift-store finds, and are essentially conceptual in their iconoclastic intent; Francis Picabia and John Currin are Bad painters of this stripe. Those of the second are more ambitious, expressive, and risky. (Sloppy-joe messiness is more ambitious because, beyond kindergarten, excesses with paint tend only to occur in a fine-art context. Mind-boggling meticulousness, by contrast, is a defining characteristic of Outsider art.)
www.artcritical.com/DavidCohen/SUN23.htm
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0773603/
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário